[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Intermediate european body
Jeannette.
I uderstand the fire of action... :-)
Now, the point I want to make is that this ML is about
nominating a candidate which has quite no chance.
You talk about taking advantage from its momentum:
IMHO it is more efficient to use it to build something real in
a real world, with a contingency plan in case of a miracle,
than to consider the miracle is granted and endanger the
momentum. All the more if you can now attract people into
action in spite of not being elected: think, if your are they
will a tremendous support. While, if you do as if the miracle
is here, they will be dismayed even by a good outcome in
terms of votes, and they will drop the issue. Up to you.
Take care. Jefsey
PS. Nothing against Andy personnally. Nothing for either:
I just never read anything from him.
At 23:31 29/08/00, you wrote:
>Jefsey,
>
>
> > I am afraid you missed my point.
>Perhaps you missed mine ;-)
>
>The question was about the
> > European Director, not about the second candidate favored by
> > @large europeans.
>
>My answer was about Andy. The point I tried to make, perhaps a bit
>too indirectly, is that we (Andy and I, that is) do agree on the
>necessity of a european council - and also on most other aspects
>related to the at-large membership we've discussed so far.
>
>
>May be you forgot about the 5 NomComs
>
>True, you have a point here.
>
> > and CCC? I am not accustomed to be accused of nonsense :-)
>
>Sorry about that, impulsive reaction. There have been quite a bit of
>unjustified reproaches against Andy on this list. By chance I jumped
>on this one ;-)
>To put it more generally: We've to cooperate if we want to get the at-
>large membership firmly established. I'd wish we wouldn't make things
>more difficult by personal hostilities. All of us have enough experience
>with mailing lists to know about the inevitable consequences.
>
> > so it makes me feel younger. Thx!
>
>You're welcome! ;-)
>
>jeanette
>
> >
> > At 17:44 29/08/00, you wrote:
> >
> > > > Roberto,
> > > > 1) on 8/13 I proposed to work an EUROCANN something from this
> > > > list. I happy it takes momentum if it is oppen to all
> > > > candidates, not - as it has been discussed - with the most
> > > > endorsed ones.
> > >
> > > > 2) however I am afraid the one who may be against it is the selected
> > > > director. We should therefore think of the intermediary
> > > > strcuture in taking this into account.
> > >
> > >Jefsey, this is really nonsense! I can assure you that Andy would want
> > >some sort of council too. We've talked about his issue quite
> > >frequently.
> > >
> > >Most of his time seems to be consumed by the ongoing debate on
> > >content filtering lately. Moreover, both of us get a lot of inquiries
> > >by the German press. This too eats up quite a bit of attention...
> > >jeanette
> >