Re: [ICANN-EU] First steps first...

[Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>]

Thomas,

At 08:36 06/09/00, you wrote:
>On 2000-09-06 00:58:39 +0200, Jefsey Morfin wrote:
> > IMHO a Director cannot be objected even by UDRP rules to have
> > a web icann-xxxx.org site wearing the name of its constituancy.
>Right.
> > Even WE as @large Members cannot be contested as long as
> > it is open to everyone.
>Yes.
> > This site will not be legally under the
> > jurisdiction/responsibility of the ICANN, avoiding them to take a
> > move. I feel they will be very happy with this but will not
> > advertize it until they see if it is well behaved.
>The question is if it is clever to move to such domain names at this
>point. and if it is clever to set up one domain per continent.

Right. I just said I reserved them. Just in case. Actually icann-lac.org
was taken by someone which may be a squatter. I reserved icann-la.org.

> > I will transfer them to the concerned non NomCom Directors if
> > any. We will discuss it in the other case. They will do whatever
> > they want with it. But we know that the ML after that names are
> > protected.
>I suppose you make this known on icann-candidates?

Not yet. This concept to my understanding still belongs to this ML.
I do not know yet if the consensus is to consider the idea (hwowever
everyone reads this ML). I think this to be correct.

>And why don't you want to transfer these domains to possible NomCom
>directors if they win the election?)

When I asked Roberto shout a me. Because we were discussing
considering that Andy was elected. I will do what the consensus will say.
If there is no consensus, I will see. I just commit to what I understand
the consensus is right now.
Jefsey