[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] IPv6, was: re-chartering this list: draft.
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] IPv6, was: re-chartering this list: draft.
- From: lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke)
- Date: 13 Sep 2000 09:55:26 GMT
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Newsgroups: iks.lists.icann.europe
- Organization: IKS GmbH Jena
- References: <39BEAF1F.8027.1BD557D@localhost>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
- User-Agent: slrn/0.9.5.7 (UNIX)
* Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>> I tried to remember your position and failed. So I (falsely) assumed a
>> connection between the IPv6 hater's list and you. That sounds so absurd
>> to me, that I posted my question.
>
>Absurd? Many IETF people disapprove of IPv6, the IETF chair is one of
>them.
For wich reasons? IPv4 address space is not squeezed? NOT!
BTW: You should remove your FAQ answer, which claims to move an existing
ccTLD to a gTLD with a complete different policy. Luckly you are not
candiding in Asia. But fortunely other nominees request the same bullshit.
>> On which aspects are you focused?
>
>The project has been finished 2 years ago. Have a look at the report, if
>you like. German and English version on my home page:
>duplox.wz-berlin.de/people/jeanette "Governing technologies and techniques
>of government"
Currently reading it. Thanks.
>Btw, the intro starts with a quote that you may like: "Fixing society to
>make folks to be rational is ok as an interim solution but it is just
>plain easier to fix technology in the long run."
(Antonov, IPv6 haters, 12.1.96)
I really hope to find something more substantial in your text.