[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] IPv6, was: re-chartering this list: draft.
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] IPv6, was: re-chartering this list: draft.
- From: Jefsey Morfin <jefsey@wanadoo.fr>
- Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2000 12:06:03 +0200
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-Reply-To: <005e01c01e20$0ec2ad40$0b0aa8c0@f-gner>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Andreas:
you point is well made. As long as a TLD is commercial
(unless the same seller has a lot of TLDs to propose) there
will be a time it will be happy making more money or accepting
customers while their name is taken elsewhere. Your exemple
of .net and .org seems correct.
This is why I think the only sollution are CINICs, ie common
interest associations/cooperative/collaboration etc...
I presented yesterday two innovative ones and the way to
smoothly and reasonably open many others traditionnal ones.
BTW, on the paper all the domain name are issued by non
profits organisation : NSI is just a subcontractor of ICANN.
On the (gree to white) paper
Jefsey
At 09:47 14/09/00, you wrote:
>Dear Andy:
>
>
>
>
> >>The problems we face now with the DNS
> >>system are nearly 100% externally caused (mostly by a mix of bad
> >>court decisions and legal theories and bad administrative practice),
> >>and we can create new TLDs until we are blue in the face, these
> >>problems won't go away.
>
> >Objection. I agree about the reasons for the current problems,
> >but not, that new TLD´s couldn´t solve any problems. I could
>i>magine that new TLD´s take place under there own rules,
> >policies and legal theories. So, next to the (not so new) idea
> >of a TLD ".TM" for the trademark-owners, i could imagine
> >".GPL" for everything under gnu public-license. We could even
> >expand these to cultural and religious spaces, like ".ISLAM"
> >(btw, they have no copyright & patent-laws ;), ".catholic"
> >for everything under Catholic policy and so on.
>
>
>Closed TLDs did not really work too well in the past,
>like .org and .net being used for anything now.
>The question is how to enforce "their own rules,
>policies"?
>
>best regards,
>
>Andreas Fuegner
>
>--
>"chaos will reign" - MPAA lawyer Leon Gold in the lawsuit against 2600 cause
>of DeCSS
>
>Andy Mueller-Maguhn, andy@ccc.de, Postfach 640234, D-10048 Berlin, Germany
>Key ID 331F9781 - Fingerprint 4996 E00B 317E AA17 9753 4678 9485 AD2A