Re: [ICANN-EU] Disclosure of ICANN At Large Membership information

["JIM FLEMING" <jfleming@anet.com>]

Karl,

It seems to me that many of the people running ICANN are amateurs.

Has the ICANN Board discussed the The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 ?

http://cyber.lp.findlaw.com/criminal/econ_esp.html

What about RICO laws ?...has the ICANN Board discussed those ?


Jim Fleming
http://www.unir.com/images/architech.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/address.gif
http://www.unir.com/images/headers.gif
http://www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/domainname/130dftmail/unir.txt
http://msdn.microsoft.com/downloads/sdks/platform/tpipv6/start.asp


----- Original Message -----
From: Karl Auerbach <karl@cavebear.com>
To: JIM FLEMING <jfleming@anet.com>
Cc: Hans Klein <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>; <DFARBER@FCC.GOV>;
<edyson@edventure.com>; Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>; Barbara Simons
<simons@acm.org>; <barbara@simons.org>; <andy@ccc.de>;
<DOMAIN-POLICY@LISTS.NETSOL.COM>; <icann-europe@fitug.de>;
<krose@ntia.doc.gov>
Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 4:45 PM
Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Disclosure of ICANN At Large Membership information


> JIM FLEMING wrote:
>
> > According to some ICANN Board members, ALL of the ICANN
> > records will be made public.
>
> Actually there's more to it than that.  The California Corporations code
> clearly says that members of a corporation, i.e. the people who vote in
> an election for board seats, have the clear right to obtain the
> membership list.
>
> The California legislature has determined that the right of the electors
> in a corporate election to organize among themselves to fully exercise
> their franchise supersedes any right of privacy that those electors may
> claim with regard to the fact of their membership.  This is nothing
> unique to the laws of California - this kind of provision is found in
> the corporations codes of many jurisdictions.
>
> If ICANN has a beef with this ICANN ought not violate California law -
> rather, ICANN should go to Sacramento and try to induce the legislature
> to change the law.
>
> I am completely fed up with ICANN's shell game in which it is trying
> every step possible to emasculate even the concept of an effective
> at-large.
>
>     --karl--
>
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mike Roberts <roberts@icann.org>
> > To: Hans Klein <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>
> > Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
> > Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2000 1:10 PM
> > Subject: [ICANN-EU] Disclosure of ICANN At Large Membership information
> >
> > > At Large Friends -
> > >
> > > ICANN receives many questions about the status of the member
> > > registration records contained in the database collected for the
> > > purpose of supporting the recent vote for five At Large Directors.
> > >
> > > This information was collected under a strict privacy rule of no
> > > commercial use, no spamming, and no disclosure to third parties.
>