[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- To: Lutz Donnerhacke <lutz@iks-jena.de>,Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Subject: Re: [icann-europe] Recommended Reading: Brad Templeton on ICANN and the DNS
- From: "Griffini Giorgio" <grunz@tin.it>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 01:02:46 +0200
- Cc: icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: moderator for icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- In-reply-to: <20010712151455.C18952@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- Priority: normal
- References: <slrn9kr5om.kl.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de>
When answering to Lutz Donnerhacke Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >This new name system must be able to collect different mappings
> >without collision. The result might be a search engine like name
> >service ...
>
> ... and the use of phone numbers instead of e-mail addresses? No
> thanks. ;-)
>
This is more or less exactly what millions of users actually do when they use
ICQ. Surely is not as friendly as using a name but actually works well for
zillions telephone device out there. All other benifical considerations about
this kind of approach show up by themselves (no uniqueness problems, IP
claims insulated within their 'natural' geographical boundaries... etc...)
The problem is that very few (percentually speaking) domain name holders
would like to sacrifice the 'privilege' of being identified by the wordlwide
unique 'name' they (usually) had the chance to choose and register by
themselves . Also so many companies made this a business and some of
them even a 'very big' business...that there are very few chances for a switch
to this new (although technically old) paradigm in the short term.
BTW, looking at the bare level, IPM (Inter Personal Messagging) is not
different from IPC (Inter Personal Conversation) when dealing on how to
reach the destination partner. The address must be unique. The interesting
thing is that we have in place an unique worldwide endpoint addressing
system that works fine and we are - more or less deliberately - ignoring this
fact. With the whole multiple/differentiated/chartered TLDs dreams we all are
just trying to climb on flat mirrors surfaces to just to save our very own
privileges.
On these premises, 'approaching a solution' is a completely different job.
IMHO of course...
Best Regards
Giorgio Griffini
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de