[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Re: Thomas Roessler proposes elimination of current voting system for GA
- To: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: Thomas Roessler proposes elimination of current voting system for GA
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 19:27:43 +0200
- Cc: atlarge discuss list <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <0ba401c207e5$e54eb100$0a00a8c0@essential.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <0ba401c207e5$e54eb100$0a00a8c0@essential.org>
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i
On 2002-05-30 10:25:47 -0400, James Love wrote:
>For the GA, Thomas Roessler wants to get rid of secrete vote on
>policy issues, and the elimination of the current voting system
>for resolutions.
How's the fact that I have made that proposal relevant to this list?
I'd suppose that you folks should really have more important things
to discuss than what I say on the GA list.
Anyway, let me just note that the main argument I make DOES NOT
APPLY to an at-large membership organization like the one you are
trying to build at icannatlarge.com. After all, the very
construction principle of an at-large membership is to form a group
of individuals - with no further structure.
(Apart of that, it's none of my business what kind of process you
folks use for statements on ICANN policy.)
--
Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de