[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] My choices for a leadership team



I'm agree with both of you.

Is important the can understand that Internet is a global process, and 
necessary for all.

Perharps is necessary almost one by each region,

Erick Iriarte


At 09:30 a.m. 17/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>I agree with Izumi and others who are concerned about diverse membership 
>on the board.   I think the next panel should address this, and make 
>proposals to ensure that the board is not dominated by one or a few 
>countries, which could happen, and which should not happen.   Right now it 
>is most important to have good candidates from different cultures and regions.
>
>Jamie
>
>
>Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>At 14:28 02/07/16 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>
>>>You are correct that many I selected are Americans... so what?  If they are
>>>the best candidates to get the job done then I will support pragmatism over
>>>political correctness any day of the week.
>>>
>>>In my view, at this point in the life of the At-Large, the interests of our
>>>community can best be protected by those that are in a position to
>>>successfully interact with the US Congress and the US Department of Commerce
>>>in order to ensure that the upcoming revised MoU provides for user
>>>participation and representation to the greatest degree possible.  The
>>>Americans that I have cited are capable of exerting such influence.
>>
>>I don't mind if someone nominates all Americans or All Japanese or Chinese,
>>whatever, that is up to him/her, but I do mind if the end-result of the panel
>>composition is very much dominated by a single country/ethnic groups for
>>the new at-large structure. We should try it to get wider representation
>>and participation. Dealing with USG is not the direct mission, and dealing
>>with US Congress is not the business of the new organization, at least
>>directly, in my opinion.
>>izumi
>>
>>
>>>Who can you propose that equally might have such leverage with these
>>>decision-makers?  I am open to suggestions...
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>------
>James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de