[atlarge-discuss] USG v all or some governments

[James Love <james.love@cptech.org>]

In my opinion, the US government is not the only relevant government at this 
point, and it is very important to lobby also at least the other GAC member 
governments.  And here a diverse membership in terms of country citizenship 
of board members is quite important.   Jamie


Erick Iriarte Ahon wrote:
> I'm agree with both of you.
> 
> Is important the can understand that Internet is a global process, and 
> necessary for all.
> 
> Perharps is necessary almost one by each region,
> 
> Erick Iriarte
> 
> 
> At 09:30 a.m. 17/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
> 
>> I agree with Izumi and others who are concerned about diverse 
>> membership on the board.   I think the next panel should address this, 
>> and make proposals to ensure that the board is not dominated by one or 
>> a few countries, which could happen, and which should not happen.   
>> Right now it is most important to have good candidates from different 
>> cultures and regions.
>>
>> Jamie
>>
>>
>> Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>
>>> At 14:28 02/07/16 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> You are correct that many I selected are Americans... so what?  If 
>>>> they are
>>>> the best candidates to get the job done then I will support 
>>>> pragmatism over
>>>> political correctness any day of the week.
>>>>
>>>> In my view, at this point in the life of the At-Large, the interests 
>>>> of our
>>>> community can best be protected by those that are in a position to
>>>> successfully interact with the US Congress and the US Department of 
>>>> Commerce
>>>> in order to ensure that the upcoming revised MoU provides for user
>>>> participation and representation to the greatest degree possible.  The
>>>> Americans that I have cited are capable of exerting such influence.
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't mind if someone nominates all Americans or All Japanese or 
>>> Chinese,
>>> whatever, that is up to him/her, but I do mind if the end-result of 
>>> the panel
>>> composition is very much dominated by a single country/ethnic groups for
>>> the new at-large structure. We should try it to get wider representation
>>> and participation. Dealing with USG is not the direct mission, and 
>>> dealing
>>> with US Congress is not the business of the new organization, at least
>>> directly, in my opinion.
>>> izumi
>>>
>>>
>>>> Who can you propose that equally might have such leverage with these
>>>> decision-makers?  I am open to suggestions...
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> ------
>> James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>> http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>> voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 
> 
> 



-- 
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de