[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[atlarge-discuss] Re: USG v all or some governments
- To: James Love <james.love@cptech.org>
- Subject: [atlarge-discuss] Re: USG v all or some governments
- From: Erick Iriarte Ahon <faia@amauta.rcp.net.pe>
- Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 11:52:44 -0500
- Cc: Izumi AIZU <izumi@anr.org>, DannyYounger@cs.com, vb@vitaminic.net, atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3D359E2C.5020009@cptech.org>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <5.0.2.5.2.20020717081512.01de4a80@anr.org><5.0.0.25.2.20020717102936.0372ad60@amauta.rcp.net.pe>
Agree with you.
Almost one by each region. Document's in the principal languages (ONU
Languages), diversity of cultures, regions, gender??.
Why?, because this is a global process, is necessary to understand that we
work for all, not only for the connecterd-people. In latinamerica only the
5% of population are connected, but this issues are important for the 100%
of the population, we need to work for all.
Erick
At 12:41 p.m. 17/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>In my opinion, the US government is not the only relevant government at
>this point, and it is very important to lobby also at least the other GAC
>member governments. And here a diverse membership in terms of country
>citizenship of board members is quite important. Jamie
>
>
>Erick Iriarte Ahon wrote:
>>I'm agree with both of you.
>>Is important the can understand that Internet is a global process, and
>>necessary for all.
>>Perharps is necessary almost one by each region,
>>Erick Iriarte
>>
>>At 09:30 a.m. 17/07/2002 -0400, James Love wrote:
>>
>>>I agree with Izumi and others who are concerned about diverse membership
>>>on the board. I think the next panel should address this, and make
>>>proposals to ensure that the board is not dominated by one or a few
>>>countries, which could happen, and which should not happen.
>>>Right now it is most important to have good candidates from different
>>>cultures and regions.
>>>
>>>Jamie
>>>
>>>
>>>Izumi AIZU wrote:
>>>
>>>>At 14:28 02/07/16 -0400, DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>You are correct that many I selected are Americans... so what? If
>>>>>they are
>>>>>the best candidates to get the job done then I will support pragmatism
>>>>>over
>>>>>political correctness any day of the week.
>>>>>
>>>>>In my view, at this point in the life of the At-Large, the interests
>>>>>of our
>>>>>community can best be protected by those that are in a position to
>>>>>successfully interact with the US Congress and the US Department of
>>>>>Commerce
>>>>>in order to ensure that the upcoming revised MoU provides for user
>>>>>participation and representation to the greatest degree possible. The
>>>>>Americans that I have cited are capable of exerting such influence.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>I don't mind if someone nominates all Americans or All Japanese or Chinese,
>>>>whatever, that is up to him/her, but I do mind if the end-result of the
>>>>panel
>>>>composition is very much dominated by a single country/ethnic groups for
>>>>the new at-large structure. We should try it to get wider representation
>>>>and participation. Dealing with USG is not the direct mission, and dealing
>>>>with US Congress is not the business of the new organization, at least
>>>>directly, in my opinion.
>>>>izumi
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Who can you propose that equally might have such leverage with these
>>>>>decision-makers? I am open to suggestions...
>>>>>
>>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>------
>>>James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>>>http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>>>voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>>For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>------
>James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
>http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
>voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de