[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [atlarge-discuss] Legitimacy Re: Fw: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC Draft 3.0



I'm still behind.  So sue me!

Judyth wrote:

>There certainly are, though there is a different set for each possible
model.
>Lawrence Solum is, I think, correct when he distinguishes between the model
>where ICANN's jurisdiction is a narrow, purely technical one and the one
where
>it oversees broader issues in the public interest.

Agree.  Unfortunately, ICANN seems to want to do both.  So we have to insist
that they do both well!

>Our past and future panels can only make the rules for us (meaning the
>relatively few people registered as members of ICANN At Large), not for
everyone
>else.

Agreed.  But hopefullt, if we can make outreach work we can speak for a
large number of people.



Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon USA
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de