Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name for Organisation

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 11:07 p.m. 10/08/2002 -0700, todd glassey wrote:
> You know - I would agree except that I would also point out that using the @
> sign to replace the word "at" in the name is a real difference in the old
> name. Its also trade markable... still if it is not to have the @ sign in it
> as the word AT then we need to probably come up with something totally new.
>
> Todd
>
> ---- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
> To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Sent: Saturday, August 10, 2002 6:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] 006 Deciding Name for Organisation
>
>
> > If we MUST use the atLarge name at all, I prefer worldatlarge.com /
> > world@large

I must caution against the use of the @ sign in our name. There is a lot of 
software that reserves this sign and will interpret text around it as a 
email address.

--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de