[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: AL001, Vote to choose organization name



Judyth and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

  I second this Resolution/motion.

espresso@e-scape.net wrote:

> At 19:36 +0200 2002/09/25, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> >This is not an acceptable way of publishing a vote's final result.
> >
> >With all due respect, I'd very much like to see a level of detail
> >similar to what is normal when the DNSO secretariat runs a vote.
> >
> >In particular, I'd like to see the individual steps of the
> >preferential voting analysis, I'd like to see a precise number of
> >valid votes delivered, I'd like to see how you have interpreted the
> >"X" ballots, I'd like to see how the votes were distributed over the
> >various alternatives (and not just the top two), and so on.
>
> I agree wholeheartedly and would like to propose the following motion:
>
> RESOLVED that
>
> a) the ad hoc Election Committee (composed of the Panel Chair and two volunteer Watchdogs] will publish the complete results of the balloting on our organization's name, including:
> - the number of members to whom ballots were sent
> - the number of ballots cast
> - the detailed results of the count for all options
> and a report on the procedure used to
> - verify ballots cast against the membership roll of the date on which ballots were distributed
> - remove duplicate or otherwise invalidated ballots
> - resolve differences (if any) in interpreting individual ballots
> - tabulate the preferential vote
> and announce the results to all members.
>
> b) the Panel analyze the results of this process with the assistance of the Elections Working Group and present the membership with
> - a recommendation on procedures to be used in future balloting;
> - a period in which that recommendation can be discussed, considered and, if need be, amended
> - a resolution to adopt the resulting procedure and an opportunity to cast their votes as to whether this procedure should be incorporated into the bylaws of the organization.
>
> Comments, anyone? Is there a seconder?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Judyth
>
> ##########################################################
> Judyth Mermelstein     "cogito ergo lego ergo cogito..."
> Montreal, QC           <espresso@e-scape.net>
> ##########################################################
> "A word to the wise is sufficient. For others, use more."
> ##########################################################
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de