[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] Re: WG-DNS name protection



The whole process that created icannatlarge was sanctioned by ICANN. Just because people don't see things your way doesn't mean they aren't thinking.
Jamie



DannyYounger@cs.com wrote:
Jamie, Esther Dyson's seed money created icannatlarge.com, not the ICANN Board.
If there is an issue over the potential use of the ICANN mark in the domain name, wouldn't a reasonable investigation demand that the owner of the ICANN mark be contacted in order to avoid any possible unpleasantness that might arise over possible infringement concerns?

I don't understand why the Panel is choosing to continue to skirt the issue. Why not just send Louis Touton a letter on the subject and get his comments on record?


--
------
James Love, Consumer Project on Technology
http://www.cptech.org, mailto:love@cptech.org
voice: 1.202.387.8030; mobile 1.202.361.3040



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de