Re: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee

["Micheal Sherrill" <micheal@beethoven.com>]

Hello Ron:

I did not receive any information prior to the report by Sotiris.  In any case, the Verification Committee needs to make all transactions public.  Sotiris is only doing his job.

Besides, you are missing the point.  Verification information has to be made public or it is not transparent.  Now, I am NOT talking about the private information that could be used for draining a personal bank account.  But, Joey did publish a rather large amount of personal information to this site earlier.

I also disagree with your last sentence.  Without a Verification Committee nothing would get done.  And all verifications need to be public.

Regards,



Micheal Sherrill


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>
Date:  Tue, 3 Jun 2003 14:10:04 -0400

Hello, Michael:

The only correspondence that I have received from Sotiris is what I read on
the public list.  I do not think that private information should be listed
publicly. As a committee member, I formally object to that action and ask
that it not happen again.

If you received this information prior to it being published, and agreed to
go public with it, then you are as accountable as Sotiris. I received
nothing other than what was published to the list.

It is the job of a verification committee to confirm (or not) the identity
of an individual and to report their findings to the Panel and the
membership. If the whole process is to take place in public... we don't need
a verification committee.

Best regards, Ron


*************************************************
 Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
            http://www.beethoven.com
Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de