RE: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee

["A/S Mauro D. Ríos" <mdrios@adinet.com.uy>]

@Large,

I agree.

The personal information is an inviolable right. Only in a voluntary way or
with the due authorization, one could make public the information of who
you/they provided it to the Committee.

I gave my information to Joey, but I didn't authorize that all it became
public, of course that if doubts of my identity arise (I was one of the 3
candidates with 5 points), I will analyze the possibility to authorize the
public use of some personal fact. Or to provide another type of information
that is of public access.

I have not seen publish any verification fact of several of the questioned
candidates.
Not solely questioned to know if they exist or not, also of chosen
candidates that are ghosts and they have never opened the mouth. In other
cases we don't have neither the elected candidate's e-mail.

regards,
Mauro.-


-----Mensaje original-----
De: Ron Sherwood [mailto:sherwood@islands.vi]
Enviado el: Martes, 03 de Junio de 2003 03:41 p.m.
Para: micheal@beethoven.com; atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
Asunto: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Provisional Membership Committee


Hello Michael:

I do agree with most of what you say, but I am still of the opinion that it
was totally unnecessary and unreasonable to publish Joey Borda's financial
relationship with his mother.  Yes it was transparent... No it was not
necessary to question that relationship in public.  If Joey wanted to do
that in public, he has the right to do so.  We, as the verification
committee, do not have that right.

If the membership does not accept our verification of an individual and
needs further details to support it, we can ask the person needing
verification what is acceptable.  We did not do that.

The work that we (we???) are doing is the work of a verification and privacy
committee.  We are obliged to verify an individual's existence and to
justify that verification, while preserving the individual's privacy to the
greatest extent possible.  We did not do that.

If we had worked as a committee, instead of only reading what Sotiris
published after Sotiris published it.  We could have done our job properly.
Sotiris prevented that from happening and you are attempting to justify his
behaviour.

The end does not always justify the means.

Ron

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de