RE: [atlarge-discuss] VC: Thawte's WOT

["A/S Mauro D. Ríos" <mdrios@adinet.com.uy>]

@All,

The debate on the verification mechanism has been put on the table in
several opportunities, I have participated and contributed my point of view
in several occasions.

I continue sustaining that we cannot only restrict ourselves to a
verification method for several reasons, for example:
- The costs of different services can be adapted for a country but extremely
expensive being in others.
- All the systems have been questioned by some member.
- Cannot seek the utopia of personal interviews, but we can come closer
using several methods enough, a mix that is effective and practical, and
that it doesn't overload the task of the VC.

Returning to the point of costs, it is not a problem trivial, several
members they have manifested what means a cost in different countries. This
discussion also thought about for the memberships. It is not easy to
establish the quantity of money, but be which is the elected option, it will
be the one that allows to arrive to the biggest mass of members (people /
users).Neither it is reasonable to be extremist and to say that $1 are very
expensive for Tumbuktu in Africa, obvious!, but observing averages, the
costs should be paar to pursue the objective of democratizing the access to
@Large.
............................


[ES] El debate sobre el mecanismo de verificación ha sido puesto sobre la
mesa en varias oportunidades, he participado y aportado mi punto de vista en
varias ocasiones.

Sigo sosteniendo que no podemos restringirnos a un sólo método de
verificación por varios motivos, por ejemplo:
- Los costos de distintos servicios pueden parecer apropiados para un país
pero ser extremadamente caros en otros.
- Todos los sistemas han sido cuestionados por algún miembro.
- No se puede pretender la utopía de entrevistas personales, pero podemos
acercarnos lo suficiente empleando varios métodos, un mix que sea efectivo y
práctico, y que no sobrecargue la tarea del VC.

Volviendo al punto de costos, no es un problema trivial, varios miembros han
manifestado lo que significa un costo en distintos lugares. Esta discusión
también se planteó para las membresías. No es fácil establecer la cantidad
de dinero, pero sea cual sea la opción elegida, deberá ser la que permita
llegar a la mayor masa de miembros (personas / usuarios). Tampoco es sensato
ser extremista y decir que $1 es muy caro para Tumbuktu en Africa, obvio!,
pero observando promedios, los costos deben ser paar perseguir el objetivo
de democratizar el acceso a @Large.

greetings,
Mauro.-



-----Mensaje original-----
De: panel-admin@mailman.icannatlarge.org
[mailto:panel-admin@mailman.icannatlarge.org]En nombre de Abel Wisman
Enviado el: Jueves, 24 de Julio de 2003 11:12 a.m.
Para: panel@mailman.icannatlarge.org
Asunto: RE: [Panel] Motion for Voters register


Inline:

> -----Original Message-----
> From: panel-admin@mailman.icannatlarge.org
> [mailto:panel-admin@mailman.icannatlarge.org] On Behalf Of
> Joop Teernstra
> Sent: 24 July 2003 08:45
> To: panel@mailman.icannatlarge.org
> Subject: Re: [Panel] Motion for Voters register
>
>
> At 01:42 p.m. 23/07/2003, Abel Wisman wrote:
> >Since there are doubts about the members who desire voting rights in
> >this organization which doubts are fed by concerns on the numbers of
> >people that need short term verificationi; it is proposed that upon
> >acceptance of this motion;
>

(...)


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.419 / Virus Database: 235 - Release Date: 13/11/2002


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de