[ICANN-EU] Re: Controversial [was: Revised version of "Things to Ask for at MDR"]

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 02:24 10/11/00 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:

>> Is is decision controversial, just because Crocker, Crispin and Stubbs are
>> vehemently opposed? 
>> Is a decision controversial when the GA votes 68 FOR,  against 3, but the
>> Board itself is evenly divided on it? (the IDNO admission into the DNSO) 
>
>Yes.
>

Yes to the first or to the second question? :-)

May I propose then that our request would be phrased in a different way,
not negative as a request to postpone, but positive as a request to decide
"as soon as": 

"We would request the Board to decide on the matters that have been
postponed because of their controversial nature, as soon as the elected at
Large Board members have been seated."
--Joop Teernstra LL.M.--  
the Cyberspace Association and 
the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
Elected representative.
http://www.idno.org