[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: Controversial [was: Revised version of "Things to Ask for at MDR"]
- To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: Controversial [was: Revised version of "Things to Ask for at MDR"]
- From: "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@medea.wz-berlin.de>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 03:11:55 +0100
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- In-reply-to: <200011100158.OAA12036@smtpout1.compass.net.nz>
- Organization: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin
- References: <3A0B5C78.15366.24416D7@localhost>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
> At 02:24 10/11/00 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>
> >> Is is decision controversial, just because Crocker, Crispin and Stubbs are
> >> vehemently opposed? Is a decision controversial when the GA votes 68 FOR,
> >> against 3, but the Board itself is evenly divided on it? (the IDNO admission
> >> into the DNSO)
> >
> >Yes.
> >
>
> Yes to the first or to the second question? :-)
That's, Joop, is for you to figure out ;-)
>
> May I propose then that our request would be phrased in a different way,
> not negative as a request to postpone, but positive as a request to decide
> "as soon as":
>
> "We would request the Board to decide on the matters that have been
> postponed because of their controversial nature, as soon as the elected at
> Large Board members have been seated."
You may of course propose that, I wouldn't support it though. Your version
assumes that controversial decisions are or would indeed be postponed. Alas,
we havn't got that far yet.
jeanette
> --Joop Teernstra LL.M.--
> the Cyberspace Association and
> the constituency for Individual Domain Name Owners
> Elected representative.
> http://www.idno.org
>