[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: .EU
- To: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] Re: .EU
- From: Tim Landscheidt <tim.landscheidt@gmx.de>
- Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 03:45:19 +0000
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Organization: <URI:http://home.pages.de/~scarface/>
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010030253240.5190-100000@s025.widexs.nl>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Marc Schneiders schrieb:
> > >1. Why we need a .eu? What is wrong with eu.int for the European
> > >Commission and its institutions?
> > The idea is not to use it for the Commission (at least not *only* for the
> > Commission + official use), but to create a "common space" for European
> > business.
> I cannot see, that this is useful. Bussinesses are either local/national
> and will not need a .eu name then, or global, and in that case better use
> a .com if they are going to compete. What companies only target the
> European market?? Or, though you don't mention them, what organizations? I
> think .eu will mainly mean duplication of existing names and some names
> for a few lucky people, who were too late for their name in .com or their
> country ccTLD.
> [...]
There are a whole lot of organizations with a European "con-
text". Somebody has to pay all the lobbyists in Bruxelles
and Strasbourg after all :-). And for businesses, I think
that the European market might be a *bit* easier to serve
than the global market. Eventually it's even called "Single
Market", and I hope we didn't standardize the bending of ba-
nanas Europe-wide for fun.
Tim