Re: [atlarge-discuss] DNSO-GA arguments belong elsewhere!

["todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeff Williams" <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
To: <eric@hi-tek.com>
Cc: "Bruce Young" <Bruce@barelyadequate.info>; "At-Large Discussion List"
<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] DNSO-GA arguments belong elsewhere!


> Eric and all stakeholders or interested parties,
>
> eric@hi-tek.com wrote:
>
> > May we hold a few truths to be self evident?
> >
> > The Internet must be not restricted yet governed.  Not by fiat or
> > proclamation.  But by the will of the users.
>
>   I would add:  "and only by the stakeholders/users"...

there are no organizations that actually represent the users of the Internet
that I know of, only those doing business on the Internet and those
expending money for Internet Resources.

>
> >
> >
> > Any matter that interferes with Access, Reliability and Stability is to
be
> > avoided.
>
>   I would add: "or as otherwise specified for specific penelities can be
> inforced and/or otherwise imposed"   than list those specific instances...
> Bla bla bla, ect. ect, Example, example... and so forth
>
> >
> >
> > Innovation and alternative solutions are to be supported and
incorporated into
> > the community of the Internet.
>
>   Good sugestion here..

As to what deliverable though? Is this forum to be qualified as competent
for designing and if so for what?

>
> >
> >
> > There are problems so we must embrace solutions.
> >
> > There is a community of Internet users and we are responsible to one
another.
> >
> > As members of the users of the Internet we must endeavour to act in the
> > interests of other users.
> >
> > Perhaps not?
> >
> > Eric
> >
> > Bruce Young wrote:
> >
> > > Over the last to days the conversation in this forum has been heavily
> > > dominiated by conversations regarding disagreements in the DNSO-GA.
I, not
> > > being a member of that body, have no intention of taking sides on
these
> > > issue, except to state that this is probably not the correct form for
> > > carrying out these conversations.
> > >
> > > Might I suggest that, rather than using up this forum's bandwidth on
what's
> > > wrong with the DNSO-GA , we instead turn the conversation back to
building
> > > the At Large?
> > >
> > > Bruce Young
> > > Portland, Oregon
> > > Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> > > http://www.barelyadequate.info
> > > --------------------------------------------
> > > Support democratic control of the Internet!
> > > Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
> > >
> >
  ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Jeffrey A. Williams
> Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
> CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
> Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
> E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
> Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
> Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de