[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [aloc] Proposed Final Draft of ALOC Submission (Vers. 3.0)
- To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>, "Hans Klein" <hans.klein@pubpolicy.gatech.edu>
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [aloc] Proposed Final Draft of ALOC Submission (Vers. 3.0)
- From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 01:19:44 +0100
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <5.1.0.14.2.20020725002222.03f8d858@mail.atl.bellsouth.net><5.1.0.14.2.20020725130547.024f4360@mail.atl.bellsouth.net><5.1.0.14.2.20020725161347.07c40ff8@mail.atl.bellsouth.net> <5.1.0.14.2.20020725193207.025122e0@mail.atl.bellsouth.net>
Denise Michel to Hans Klein:
>Personally, I think your text is ill-advised and should not be included.
>
>And, BTW, my opinion does matter. I am not (as you say) your "facilitator"
>in this matter. As one of the people the ERC asked to convene the
>assistance group to draft the document, I share a large burden of the
>responsibility for submitting a substantive proposal -- and I am drafting
>it. It's way too confusing having multiple people re-writing, editing and
>re-naming documents and suggesting new release processes. So please
respect
>the process, and I, in turn, will continue to solicit any substantive work
>you would like to submit.
OK: let's analyse this...
>Personally, I think your text is ill-advised and should not be included.
And you, Denise (NOT an AtLarge representative) are judging what should be
included, contrary to Hans (who IS an AtLarge representative)... top-down
not bottom up
>And, BTW, my opinion does matter.
Denise's opinion and right to draft how "our" committee is projected (though
Denise does NOT represent the AtLarge community) and although the AtLarge
did not ask Denise to do this... top-down not bottom up
>I am not (as you say) your "facilitator"
Ah! Exactly as I feared! Imposed from above by ICANN, not to facilitate, but
to push through an unwanted agenda - did the AtLarge ask for this (or for
you)? ... top-down not bottom up
>and I am drafting it. It's way too confusing having multiple people
So someone who does NOT represent the AtLarge community is putting it
together? Did the At Large community ask you to construct an ALAC for them?
At least Hans Klein's views have the legitimacy of coming from the At
Large's own community. Who actually asked you to do this, Denise? Answer:
the ICANN Board ... top-down not bottom up
>So please respect the process
Why?
It's not our process and it's taken the place of our elected Board members
Why respect the process?
* * * * * * * * * * *
Richard Henderson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de