Re: [atlarge-discuss] No icannatlarge.com reps on ERC task force

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Joanna and all stakeholders or other interested parties,

  I also must, in this instance and in the situation that Joanna
nicely describes below, agree with her, even though it is
quite disgusting in that Vittorio's lack of assertiveness in
his capacity with the ICANNATLARGE.COM' members
as the panel chair.

  This is why I have called and will continue to, that any elected
person to the next panel must either recuse him/herself from any
other affiliations or sign an affidavit that the business in their
capacity as an elected panel or representative regardless of
that capacity, serve the members of ICANNATLARGE.COM
in any areas dealing with ICANN or any other internet related
organization in order to avoid the possibility of COI..

  I would also call upon any and all of the listed representatives
or members of the ALOC and the ALAC do the same...



Joanna Lane wrote:

> Is it
> > better a task force that has some icannatlarge.com members, even if
> > with other affiliations, or is it better if none of our members takes
> > part to the task force? Do you really think that I, Gabriel Pineiro,
> > Hans Klein, Peter Shane, Izumi Aizu, are making a mistake in
> > participating in this? Or we'd better leave the task of drafting the
> > public's voice in the Blueprint process only to the other ALOC
> > participants? (This is not a rhetorical question: I've been asking it
> > to myself repeatedly.)
> > --
> > vb.               [Vittorio Bertola - v.bertola [a] bertola.eu.org]<------
> > ----------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/
>
> If the person currently holding the highest office this organization has to
> offer cannot bring themselves to LOBBY for our organization to this
> Committee and OBJECT LOUDLY that our organization has no representative on
> this Committee, then they shouldn't be in the job. Vittorio, you haven't
> done that, why not?
>
> A conflict of interest means we cannot define who is representing whom and
> how, so it has to be a choice. You made that choice already and your actions
> speak for themselves.
>
> Notwithstanding that you were elected Chair of this organization, you chose
> to sit on a related Committee as a representative of another organization.
> This tells me that:-
>
> 1) ICANNAtLarge.com is not a priority for you. The other organization is a
> more important.
>
> 2) Accountability is not a principle you hold in very high esteem. If
> accountability were your priority, you would not have got yourself into a
> position as an officer of this organization holding the top job, whereby you
> cannot be held accountable by the membership for anything that you do or say
> on this related committee.
>
> 3) You are comfortable working under ICANN's criteria for indirect
> representation of At Large interests on top-down, Staff appointed Task
> Forces.
>
> Have a nice holiday.
>
> Regards,
> Joanna
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 124k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number:  972-244-3801 or 214-244-4827
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de