[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC Draft - At-Large Structures
I don't quite understand the distinction...but in general I'm not in favor
of enforced uniformity.
Esther
At 12:33 AM 7/26/2002, Joop Teernstra wrote:
>At 05:21 p.m. 25/07/2002 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
>>Jamie -
>>
>>You are free as an individual to organize whatever "at-Large structure"
>>you wish to create. You can also rally the forces of Nader behind you if
>>you want. No one is stopping you.
>
>Esther,
>
>Do you really prefer a (large) number of "At Large structures" with the
>impossibility to compare their relative weight, or would you be willing to
>agree with me that it would be better to have a (large) number of "At
>Large parties" with a uniform structure?
>
>--Joop
Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes!
chairman, EDventure Holdings
writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
edyson@edventure.com
1 (212) 924-8800 -- fax 1 (212) 924-0240
104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
New York, NY 10011 USA
http://www.edventure.com
The conversation continues..... at
http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de