[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] Point of order
- To: espresso@e-scape.net
- Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] Point of order
- From: Stephen Waters <swaters@amicus.com>
- Date: 29 Jul 2002 17:40:47 -0500
- Cc: At-Large Discussion List <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- Delivered-To: mailing list atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <l03130305b96a9a3c9207@[216.13.51.68]>
- List-Help: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <l03130305b96a9a3c9207@[216.13.51.68]>
On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 17:51, espresso@e-scape.net wrote:
> Forgive me for coming out of nowhere with this but I think it might be helpful, at least to those of us who do not have 4 GB hard disks and unlimited broadband access, if people were thoughtful enough to edit their quotations of previous messages down to the specific points they are responding to.
The problem is sometimes you lose context and people get misquoted or
misrepresented.
-s
This is a digitally signed message part