Re: [atlarge-discuss] Point of personal privilege -- I'm being disenfranchised by glitches in the system!

[nhklein@gmx.net]

> At 11:48 PM 03/08/02 -0400, espresso@e-scape.net wrote:
> 
> >However, I went through my archives and dug out the original messages
> from 
> >ICANN which confirm my status as a member, assuming that these would be 
> >sufficient for the Powers That Be to look into the matter and perhaps
> even 
> >send me a ballot in time.
> 
> That means you are a member (or at least could vote)
> in the ICANN at Large elections which elected Karl
> Auerbach and others. That does not mean that you are
> automatically a member of the icannatlarge.com which
> was begun subsequent to the subsequent Atlarge study.
> Although that is an interesting point.

I think this is not only an interesting, but also a very important point:
probably a point where lagalities and common sense are in conflict.

Is it not natural that a person who registered for the only open "ICANN
At-Large" elections thinks to be also authorized to vote in the "icannatlarge"
elections - in our organization that was created to take up the history which
the ICANN board wants to cut?

If we have any common sense flexibility (concerned with content and not only
with formalities) in our organization, I would hope that the election
watchdogs and the people elected ad interim could find a solution.

Or at least an apology that we did not think about the implications of the
membership in the "ICANN At-Large" for the membership in our "ICANNATLARGE."

Norbert

-- 
Norbert Klein
Open Forum of Cambodia: www.forum.org.kh

Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de