Re: [atlarge-discuss] Opportunity for Action

[eric@hi-tek.com]

I was against this idea but I now do not see our group and an SO as the same and
it makes sense.
We can do both, separately.  But this group should never be an SO. ICANN may end
up being one of it's SOs.
Eric

Bruce Young wrote:

> Danny Younger wrote:
>
> >I would advise having the icannatlarge.com
> >Panel contact each member of the ALAC team and ask them to immediately
> >endorse a joint statement in support of the creation of such a Supporting
> >Organization.
>
> Although I railed in the past against this idea when the ALSC recommended
> it, and don't feel it would give us nearly as much influence as that
> mandated in the MoU, at this point I agree with Danny that this might be our
> best change for continuing our conversation with ICANN. This is not to say
> that this needs to be our final relationship: if outreach is successful,
> number have a way of changing peoples minds!  But it's a good negotiating
> position for now.
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon
> Bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.com and Join ICANN At Large!
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de