Re: [atlarge-discuss] The Media's take on the ALAC proposals

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Richard and all stakeholders or other interested parties and members,

  Do you have the URL for this article?

  It should also not come as a surprise should it that ICANN got the
drop on the ICANNATARGE.COM members should it?  I think
not unfortunately...

Richard Henderson wrote:

>    Help
>
> The Washington Internet Daily reports:
>
> The at-large panel floated proposals "aimed at giving Internet users A
> STRONGER VOICE in ICANN";
>
> This was a starting point  from which to "phase in MORE USER
> PARTICIPATION";
>
> and that to participate in the ALAC member election process, Regional
> AtLarge organisations would each have to sign a memorandum of
> understanding with ICANN
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> How is abolishing ICANN @ large Directors giving users a "Stronger
> Voice"?
>
> How is abolishing ICANN @ large Directors "phasing in MORE user
> participation"?
>
> And of course the "ALAC member election process" is NOT to elect a
> Board member?
>
> De-SPIN the whole thing, and what's the reality:
>
> Internet Users have a WEAKER voice and LESS user participation.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
>
> What's disappointing is that the media are reporting it as PROGRESS -
> exactly what ICANN intended.
>
>
>
>

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup - (Over 127k members/stakeholders strong!)
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng/SR. Java/CORBA Development Eng.
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 972-244-3801
Address: 5 East Kirkwood Blvd. Grapevine Texas 75208



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de