[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] Re: Jamie's motion: what will it be, "control" or rule of law



On 06:33 a.m. 17/10/2002 -0700, Bret Fausett said:
Joop, I understand that part of the intent is simply to confirm our
arrangement via a vote. You and I decided that ourselves before there was an
elected panel.
Hi Bret,

The main question was not answered by Jamie:

How is the Panel going to appoint a webmaster of a (political) on-line organization doing the bidding of 11 Panel members without public rules that both regulate and protect him with regards to content?

(this applies just as much to my own unelected, unappointed bootstrap position--the continued absence of rules makes the job untenable)

For this organization to have any permanence you need the Rule of Law, not some subjective "trust".

--Joop


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de