[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] Re: Jamie's motion: what will it be, "control" or rule of law



At 23:22 17/10/02, Joop Teernstra wrote:
On 06:33 a.m. 17/10/2002 -0700, Bret Fausett said:
Joop, I understand that part of the intent is simply to confirm our
arrangement via a vote. You and I decided that ourselves before there was an
elected panel.
Hi Bret,

The main question was not answered by Jamie:

How is the Panel going to appoint a webmaster of a (political) on-line organization doing the bidding of 11 Panel members without public rules that both regulate and protect him with regards to content?

(this applies just as much to my own unelected, unappointed bootstrap position--the continued absence of rules makes the job untenable)

For this organization to have any permanence you need the Rule of Law, not some subjective "trust".
Dear Joop,
The WG-DNS intent to implement for each panelist an http://his-name.atlarge.org and his-name@atlarge.org address (once Hans got atlarge.org from Marc, or using atlarge.ws if he refuses). They will have their own ftp access and pages. All what the webmaster will have to do is to keep a link active to it and possibly a form to an headline of them.

Another link will go to the forum.

The real issue I have is the membership registration and management. Can you please document it and advise about its future management.

thank you. jfc



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de