Re: [atlarge-discuss] Re: [wg-bylaws] Re: [atlarge-panel] votes about to be called

["Micheal Sherrill" <micheal@beethoven.com>]

Then how did this message get on the list?  Nut cases like you, Jeff (or whatever you are), need to judged by their actions, as individuals, not as an encompassing ideal that fits most of the populous.  Sometimes, there have to be exceptions to the rule.  You are a textbook example of that exception.  Your insanity is not only a burden to this Internet society but also an impairment.  You seek to disrupt for disruption’s sake.  That is not necessarily your right.  It might be, more so, your personal sickness.  We do not have to accept your insanity.  Understand it, yes, tolerate it, no.  Go someplace else and disrupt.

Regards,

Micheal Sherrill


---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>
Date:  Wed, 15 Jan 2003 18:19:34 -0800

David and all stakeholders/users or other interested parties,

  How can there be a vote called when still there is CENSORSHIP
of members such as myself form participating openly and transparently
in debate and discussion in the atlarge-discuss list?  Seems more than
just a little bit illegitimate to me...

DPF wrote:

> On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 23:00:56 -0000, "Richard Henderson"
> <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com> wrote:
>
> >When was the whole membership asked THEIR views on whether to participate in
> >ICANN's RALOs and asked their views on our relationship to ICANN?
>
> While I am keen to make progress I agree with Richard that the
> membership should vote on this fundamental issue firstly as it will
> affect most other things.
>
> I think the key decision is whether or not to join ICANN's ALSO
> through the RALOs or stay totally outside as a pressure group etc.
>
> To help informed decision making perhaps what would be useful is for
> the panel to approve a vote on joining the RALOs or not and as part of
> that have the proponents for both views present say a 250 word summary
> of their case.  I would certainly be happy to present the case for
> joining and Richard has been eloquent in presenting the case not to do
> so.
>
> Once this issue is decided then mission statements and bylaws can
> follow fairly quickly.  It would also allow those who don't like the
> decision to direct their efforts elsewhere if they wish to.
> Personally I will stay involved no matter what the decision because I
> believe in using every opportunity there is to make the case for
> increasing ICANN's accountability.
>
> DPF
> --
> E-mail: david@farrar.com
> ICQ:    29964527
> MSN:    dpf666@hotmail.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de




*************************************************
 Listen to the "World's Classical Radio Station"
            http://www.beethoven.com
Great Music, Free Email, Exciting Bulletin Board!

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de