[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] ELECTIONS AND REVIVAL ORGANIZATION ????



Bruce!

I agree with everything in your mail (below) and I'm delighted we're finally
moving towards simple, sensible action. EXCEPT for one section on the
timing:

We cannot possibly (in my opinion) start the voting next Saturday. If we're
going to have a respectable process for this election, it is essential we
have a period of time for:

(A) Nominations
(B) Statements from Candidates (otherwise voters cannot make informed
judgements) and Questions from Members (they have the right to question
candidates to clarify their candidature
(C) Voting

I propose that a link is provided on the ballot e-mails, leading to the
webpages where candidates' statements can be read. I am happy to do this at
icannatlarge.co.uk if you like. We also need a page to formally list who
nominates and seconds. Lastly, it would be helpful to have a page where
members can post their questions.

I praise you and Jefsey to moving towards a simple and effective election,
but urge you to allow time for (A) (B) and (C) in the process.

yrs,

Richard Henderson

----- Original Message -----
From: <bruce@barelyadequate.info>
To: <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Saturday, February 22, 2003 7:49 AM
Subject: RE: [atlarge-discuss] ELECTIONS AND REVIVAL ORGANIZATION ????


> Jefsey Morfin wrote:
>
> |  1. I have asked Joop to prepare the boot. He asked
> |  clarifications IRT the
> |  definition of what we would vote for. I responde an 11 members Panel,
> |  managing the web site and the Membership list, incorporating and
> |  entering
> |  into MoUs subject to the Memership approval for everything else - what
> |  addresses in a simple and in orderly way what the most vociferous asked
> |  for. This for six months if there is no incorporation, one year
> |  otherwise.
>
> This sounds reasonable.  It's a good concensus of the thinking we've been
> reading here recently.
> Members should speak up if they have serious issues with these parameters.
>
> |  Now we all need to know if he will provide the booth or if he
> |  too will quit :-)
>
> Please don't quit Joop (I don't expect you to, but the plea is heart-felt
> anyway)!  Also, I challenge Vittorio to crank up his e-mail voting system,
> or arrainge with what's left of the DNSO to reuse theirs as we did before,
> to give those limited to e-mail a chance to participate.
>
> |  2. I have asked Joop that the Panel Members may act as Voting
> |  Controllers.
> |  I want to be one. I suppose Bruce, Vittorio and others from the Panel
> |  (including the waintinglist) may want to be one too.
>
> I'll gladly volunteer for this duty.  The more the better though at this
> juncture, and not just panel members.  We want no future accusations of
> capture!
>
> 3. We have nominated people on this list and on the Forum. I
> |  wish there are
> |  others, but we can proceed. I may send them a mail to ask them if they
> |  accept being candidate.
>
> Please do so.  BTW, as a blanket policy, I stand ready and willing to
serve
> in whatever capacity the membership wishes, and will gladly accept same if
> nominated!
>
> |  4. We have a first proposed country to incorporate, I hope we
> |  have another one.
>
> I propose we incorporate in Oregon, USA.  I'll handle the paperwork if
> asked, and will even donate the filing fees ($35 US if I remember
> correctly!).
>
> |  If there is support to proceed, the plan I proposed can be
> |  easily executed,
> |  we may start voting on Sunday if enough candidates, or the other
> |  Sunday if
> |  we need more.
>
> You have my support.  Since it's almost Saturday here already, let's shoot
> for next Sunday.
>
> |  I keep with my target
> |  to incorporate in March and to sign MoUs with Joop (Polling Booth), DPF
> |  (his initaitive), Danny (his SME contituency), me (atlarge/ws)
> |  and may be others in April, after the Members voted them.
>
> OK.
>
>
> Bruce Young
> Portland, Oregon USA
> bruce@barelyadequate.info
> http://www.barelyadequate.info
> --------------------------------------------
> Support democratic control of the Internet!
> Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!
>
>
> |  -----Original Message-----
> |  From: J-F C. (Jefsey) Morfin [mailto:jefsey@club-internet.fr]
> |  Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 6:36 AM
> |  To: atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de
> |  Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] ELECTIONS AND REVIVAL ORGANIZATION ????
> |
> |
> |  Due to the moderate interest by this list in the election that many
have
> |  shouted for I wander if I must cotinue to proceed?
> |
> |  1. I have asked Joop to prepare the boot. He asked
> |  clarifications IRT the
> |  definition of what we would vote for. I responde an 11 members Panel,
> |  managing the web site and the Membership list, incorporating and
> |  entering
> |  into MoUs subject to the Memership approval for everything else - what
> |  addresses in a simple and in orderly way what the most vociferous asked
> |  for. This for six months if there is no incorporation, one year
> |  otherwise.
> |
> |  Now we all need to know if he will provide the booth or if he
> |  too will quit :-)
> |
> |  2. I have asked Joop that the Panel Members may act as Voting
> |  Controllers.
> |  I want to be one. I suppose Bruce, Vittorio and others from the Panel
> |  (including the waintinglist) may want to be one too.
> |
> |  3. We have nominated people on this list and on the Forum. I
> |  wish there are
> |  others, but we can proceed. I may send them a mail to ask them if they
> |  accept being candidate.
> |
> |  4. We have a first proposed country to incorporate, I hope we
> |  have another one.
> |
> |  If there is support to proceed, the plan I proposed can be
> |  easily executed,
> |  we may start voting on Sunday if enough candidates, or the other
> |  Sunday if
> |  we need more. We can also reduce the Panel to 7 if there are not
> |  candidates
> |  enough. But I must say that if we do not vote for a panel now, I think
> |  there is something broken in this group after so many demands (or the
> |  demands did not represented whatthe Members wanted?). I keep
> |  with my target
> |  to incorporate in March and to sign MoUs with Joop (Polling Booth), DPF
> |  (his initaitive), Danny (his SME contituency), me (atlarge/ws)
> |  and may be
> |  others in April, after the Members voted them.
> |  jfc
> |
> |
> |  jfc
> |
> |
> |
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de