Re: [atlarge-discuss] Panel Motion Passed! On to Elections!

[Holger Steiner <h.steiner@scharr.de>]

Jeff Williams schrieb:
> 
> Holger and all fellow members,
> 
> Holger Steiner wrote:
> 
> > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > >
> > > Holger and all fellow members,
> > >
> > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > >
> > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hoger and all fellow members,
> > > > >
> > > > > Holger Steiner wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Jeff Williams schrieb:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Judyth and all fellow members,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > espresso@e-scape.net wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > At 02:48 -0800 2003/04/03, Jeff Williams wrote:
> > > > > > > > >  You have just betrayed the members Judyth!  :(  There is NO panel
> > > > > > > > >and you know and knew that!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear Jeff and anyone who feels like him,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I am sorry you feel that way but have to disagree with you
> > > > > > > > about this, Our group decided it needed to elect a new Panel.
> > > > > > > > The only "authority" we have is what's left of the preceding
> > > > > > > > one which can carry out the Panel's duty to conduct proper
> > > > > > > > elections. The alternative is to let individual members
> > > > > > > > decide they personally will run the group, at which point
> > > > > > > > we may as well all give up.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   Hogwash here Judyth!  You made a pledge, do you recall?
> > > > > > > If not I shall post that Archived E-Mail of your pledge.  You broke
> > > > > > > that pledge.  In addition in doing so, you have earned disrespect
> > > > > > > and distrust.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Actually, I remember she wrote about giving the list to the
> > > > > > rest of the panel (three members left?) when she received the list
> > > > > > from Vittorio.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Did she retract that later?
> > > > >
> > > > >   Nope.  Check the Archives for yourself.  I you can find a retraction
> > > > > post it.  But you won't as there is none.
> > > >
> > > > If I interpret your near complete sentences correct, you think
> > > > also she is doing the thing she said she would do?
[snip]

> > >  And no
> > > of course she didn't.  That's the point Holger.  Get a grip
> > > and a clue.
> >
> > Maybe we are talking not about the same thing.
> 
>   Yes I no doubt we are.

;-)

 
> > I thought (by reading your message) you were aggravated about her giving
> > the list of members to the three remaining panel members.
> 
>   There are no remaining Panel members.  Judyth giving the membership
> list to ANYONE was a violation of her pledge.

I thought there were three panel members left.

I am sure I read that somewhere...

 
> > Did I understand you wrong?
> 
>   Partly yes.  There are NO panel members is what you don't seem
> to understand or comprehend.  And, giving the membership list
> to ANYONE is a violation of her pledge without the members
> permission is the remainder of what you did't/don't seem to
> comprehend.
> 
>   If you doubt this, the above,, look up her pledge in the archives...

As I said, I think there are three left. And she wrote something
about that when she received the member list.


greetings
Holger

-- 
######################################
Holger Steiner
Programmer & Consultant
Synchron GmbH
h.steiner@synchron-is.de
http://www.synchron-is.de
<script>alert("Only the code gets executed, not the
intentions...")</script>
######################################

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de