[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[atlarge-discuss] election officers are neutral?

Jefsey,

Transparency.

I object to you using the opportunity to correspond with candidates and voters to make misrepresentations of another candidate's ideas for online democracy and propaganda for your own.

1. I trust Joop judgement for a long even if we disagree on
    targets :-)  I pretend he is a sad defensor of the building
    of a XIXth century institution for individual users. I call
    for a real vision up-grading this prototype internet by some
    senile Yankees (I am part of this for 26 years and shared
    into the first multinational network deployment of the US
    worldwide de facto monoploy :-) into something usefull
    for 6 billions of users and 600 billions of systems.
This is not how a neutral election officer should operate.

All correspondence with candidates and with voters must be public, or if this is not possible, subject to watchdog scrutiny.

Jefsey, I am sorry to say your behaviour is turning this election into a farce.



-joop-



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de