[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists
I agree to the 75% rule
Ron Sherwood
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Henderson" <richardhenderson@ntlworld.com>
To: "Ron Sherwood" <sherwood@islands.vi>; "Atlarge Discuss List"
<atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists
> I totally agree... with the addition that on this basis a renegade
panelist
> could 'get away' with a 33% voting record by voting once in three votes,
so
> I think all panelists should be bound to vote 75% of the time, in addition
> to the three strikes and you're out rule!
>
> Richard H
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Ron Sherwood <sherwood@islands.vi>
> To: Walter Schmidt <walts@dorsai.org>; Atlarge Discuss List
> <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> Cc: Walter Schmidt <walts@dorsai.org>
> Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 1:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists
>
>
> > Good morning, Walter:
> >
> > This is not a Chamber of Commerce with a monthly meeting.
> >
> > It is a working Panel with asynchronous contact and will be discussing
and
> > voting on issues on an ongoing basis. The Chamber model does not fit.
> >
> > I suggest that any Panel member that with unexcused failure to
participate
> > in three successive votes has automatically resigned from the Panel.
> >
> > A vote can be an abstention. A public voting log should be kept in
order
> > that the membership may understand a Panelist's voting record.
> >
> > Ron Sherwood.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Walter Schmidt" <walts@dorsai.org>
> > To: "Atlarge Discuss List" <atlarge-discuss@lists.fitug.de>
> > Cc: "Walter Schmidt" <walts@dorsai.org>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2003 8:23 AM
> > Subject: Re: [atlarge-discuss] The issue of non-voting panelists
> >
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 1 Jun 2003, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > >
> > > > I suggest that any panelist who fails to vote in three consecutive
> votes
> > > > (or in 75% of all votes) should face a vote of confidence from the
> whole
> > > > Membership.
> > >
> > > ...or, perhaps, a vote of confidence from the Panel?
> > >
> > > A local Chamber of Commerce felt so strongly about participation this
is
> > > in their By-Laws:
> > >
> > > Section 9. Automatic Removal - Absence by a member of the Board from
> three
> > > (3) consecutive regular meetings of the Board and/or of the Chamber
> > > without deemed valid excuse and so recorded by the Board, shall be
> > > construed as a resignation from office.
> > >
> > > Works for them - and yes, it has been "used."
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > --- REgards, walts@dorsai.org Walter C. Schmidt, IT CPA
Blue(^) ---
> > > - - Microsoft MVP - Windows XP Media Center Edition - HPMC
73n ---
> > > - - Associate Expert - Expert
Zone - -
> > > ---
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/ ---
> > > - -
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/columns/schmidt/ ---
> > > - - 52 Ken http://www.dorsai.org/~walts/ Sun
57 - -
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> > >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> > For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de