RE: [atlarge-discuss] http://icannatlarge.com

[<bruce@barelyadequate.info>]

Sotiris Sotiropoulos wrote:

| Take a look at http://icannatlarge.com and then compare it with
| http://icannatlarge.org and tell me which looks more like an
| authentic organization web site?

Joop only has himself to agree with on what content to post.  Further, he
has a full-time Webmaster to update it (him!).  We, on the other hand, still
have no Webmaster, and no group feeding info to post to the site even if we
did.  So of course his is going to look better.  What have you offered to do
lately to make our site better?  Nothing, huh?  I thought not!

However, I didn't know this was a beauty contest!  A Web site run by
democratic processes is always going to be updated less often than on run by
a single person.  ICANNATLARGE.ORG is the official site of this group.
ICANNATLARGE.COM is a one-man show run by Joop. No valid comparison.

Bruce Young
Portland, Oregon
bruce@barelyadequate.info
http://www.barelyadequate.info
--------------------------------------------
Support democratic control of the Internet!
Go to http://www.icannatlarge.org and Join ICANN At Large!



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de