[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: [icann-eu] [ecdiscuss] Re: Horrible young sites
- To: "Harald Alvestrand" <Harald@Alvestrand.no>, "Olivier Guillard" <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>
- Subject: AW: [icann-eu] [ecdiscuss] Re: Horrible young sites
- From: SchultzKom@t-online.de (Christian Schultz Kommunalberatung)
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 14:17:40 +0100
- Cc: "Olivier Guillard / AFNIC" <Olivier.Guillard@nic.fr>, <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Importance: Normal
- In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20001121125517.06fdfef8@127.0.0.1>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Olivier,
good that you disclosed such dirty sites. But did you inform also the public
prosecutor or district attorney about this?
The internet allows all, we see what can happen and how difficult it is -
technically - to prevent such abuse of freedom.
Best regards
Christian
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de [mailto:owner-icann-europe@fitug.de]Im
Auftrag von Harald Alvestrand
Gesendet: Dienstag, 21. November 2000 12:59
An: Olivier Guillard
Cc: Olivier Guillard / AFNIC; icann-europe@fitug.de
Betreff: Re: [icann-eu] [ecdiscuss] Re: Horrible young sites
At 12:34 21/11/2000 +0100, Olivier Guillard wrote:
>NSI doesn't maintain any whois DB.
you're wrong, but you're right....whois.networksolutions.com is definitely
maintained by NSI, but the data we're talking about comes from
whois.opensrs.net.
> > but it would not help much if NSI did not allow obvious fakes, because
> > there would still be fakes, just less obvious ones.
>
>Depend how is maintained the DB, the question is what is the minimum of
>quality that should be expected from the information published.
how would you propose that the quality be maintained?
--
Harald Tveit Alvestrand, alvestrand@cisco.com
+47 41 44 29 94
Personal email: Harald@Alvestrand.no