[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ICANN-EU] Re: Elections/Endorsements
- To: "Marc Schneiders" <marc@venster.nl>
- Subject: [ICANN-EU] Re: Elections/Endorsements
- From: "Andreas Fügner" <Andreas.Fuegner@lizenz.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2000 19:51:13 +0200
- Cc: <icann-europe@fitug.de>
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Dear Marc:
>Not per se. Courts do not accept cases so easily as WIPO. Often there
>would have been no case, but for WIPO.
Mediation does not close the door to court.
If no agreement is reached through mediation
a party is still at liberty to file a law suit.
>I have spend some time on the list at WIPO and read a number of the
>decisions. I do not deny that there are cases where it was correct to take
>a domain from the owner. More often this was not so.
I don't think one is able to judge, whether it was right or wrong to
transfer a domain,
just by looking at the parties and domain involved. The list just
provides a glimps of
what we are talking about.
>As for perspective: that is exactly what this is all about. I hope you do
>not think there is only one, to wit yours.
There are plenty and, if for instance usage becomes an issue, yours
are intrigueing.
>Anyway, your position is now clear to me. I must have been misled by some
>of the idealistic words on your page. I should have given more weight to
what
>you do for a living: making the companies that have interests in curtailing
the free
>flow of information happy. I am afraid I am at the other side of the
>battle lines.
Now where do you see that?
What has my business to do with "making companies happy, that have
interests
in curtailing the free flow of information"? Did I miss something?
And by the way, I don't see us fighting a battle or being on
different sides.
We might have different opinions but I hope we have the same goal.
Best regards,
Andreas