Re: [ICANN-EU] BiGuB-Questionaire, results

[Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com>]

On Sat, Aug 26, 2000 at 05:39:52AM +0200, Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org> wrote:
> > I think the matter *is* very important if you think otherwise you are
> > entitled to your opinion, but this is no reason to ignore the facts. I am
> 
> In that particular case, there are no facts.

Indeed. So why do you try to cite (unrelated) facts? ;(

> well readable with lynx, and thus accessible to vision-impaired

Some vision-impaired users did think otherwise. This is a fact. The only
fact. I didn't claim otherwise.

> users. Same for the CCC homepage (which really is no matter here,
> since it's not the CCC who's the candidate).

If this is not the case, then why does Mr. Mueller-Maguhn advertise the
CCC so much (roughly half of what he writes on his candidate page is
ccc-related). Sure, the CCC is definitely not candidating itself, but Mr.
Maguhn certainly drags it into the game, so naturally the CC becomes part
of the discussion.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |