[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ICANN-EU] thanx for the fish & lets start the work
- To: Geza Giedke <ggiedke@fe-c705.uibk.ac.at>
- Subject: Re: [ICANN-EU] thanx for the fish & lets start the work
- From: Alf Hansen <aha@uninett.no>
- Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 11:30:00 +0200
- CC: icann-europe@fitug.de
- Comment: This message comes from the icann-europe mailing list.
- Organization: UNINETT FAS
- References: <v03102837b6090da144ad@[10.1.1.42]> <200010110848.KAA18883@fe-c705.uibk.ac.at>
- Sender: owner-icann-europe@fitug.de
Hi,
What is importan are the CHARTERS for new lists. Andy, do you have the
charters ready for the new lists you have proposed?
Best regards,
Alf H
Geza Giedke wrote:
>
> Andy Mueller-Maguhn writes:
> > icann-debate@lists.ccc.de
> > (subscribe with: icann-debate-subscribe@lists.ccc.de)
> >
> > is thought as an open forum of internet-users & at-large
> > members for discussion of icann- & related discussions
>
> My first thought: what do we need another list for? Isn't
> icann-europe@fitug.de enough? In which respect would
> icann-debate@lists.ccc.de differ from icann-europe@fitug.de?
> One discussion list is IMHO better than two unless there are clear
> distictions as to what is discussed in either list.
>
> But then: icann-europe@fitug.de has been largely a european affair -
> but as I see it there is only one topic that is (was) really
> euro-specific: the European @Large director.
> Now that the election is over, most questions will concern all regions
> alike.
> Wouldn't it therefore be better to have some global forum in which all
> the discussions that are not specific to a region are held? There is
> no need to feel ourselves bound to the artificial separation
> introduced by ICANN. Is the not-region-specific traffic here willing
> to move to some global list?
>
> Could/Should icann-debate@lists.ccc.de try to become this global list?
>
> any comments?
>
> regards
> Geza
>
>