[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [icann-europe] .kids or .kids.us?
- To: "Jeanette Hofmann" <jeanette@medea.wz-berlin.de>,Thomas Roessler <roessler@does-not-exist.org>,Marc Schneiders <marc@schneiders.org>
- Subject: Re: [icann-europe] .kids or .kids.us?
- From: chiari mario <chiari.hm@flashnet.it>
- Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2001 11:39:50 +0200
- Cc: icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- Delivered-To: icann-europe@angua.rince.de
- Delivered-To: mailing list icann-europe@lists.fitug.de
- In-Reply-To: <3B43B983.5725.840B23@localhost>
- List-Help: <mailto:icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Id: <icann-europe.lists.fitug.de>
- List-Post: <mailto:icann-europe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Subscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-subscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de>
- Mailing-List: contact icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de; run by ezmlm
- References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107050033080.57701-100000@pan.bijt.net><20010705002131.B8974@sobolev.does-not-exist.org>
Good point!
mario (chiari)
At 00.49 05/07/01 +0100, Jeanette Hofmann wrote:
>On 5 Jul 2001, at 0:35, Marc Schneiders wrote:
>
>
>> >
>> > >It is no problem to switch to an other DNS-Root, as shown by all
>> > >those independant guys, they are still able to resolve all that
>> > >"USA-can" Domains they want to be able to, plus their own ones.
>> >
>> > Except for the enormous incredible inertia brought in by all those
>> > machines which are configured to use the current root.
>> >
>> > Face it: The only way to get "the internet" to turn away from the
>> > current set of root servers is to shut them down.
>>
>> If I may say so, in the spirit of the original Europa story, you
>> referred to earlier: this is Bull sh*t. Most people resolve over their
>> ISP's nameservers. If these (or a substantial number of them) change,
>> then something happens. New.NET understands this.
>
>I think the problem is less of a technical but of an administrative or
political nature. You
>don't need the USG or ICANN to watch over the root. However, you need a
body that
>prevents collisions. I don't find New.NET's market based approach really
convincing.
>Where is the model, where is the charter that would constitute such a
coordinative
>body? And how could such a charter rule out that the new body wouldn't end
up in
>ICANN version 2?
>
>jeanette
>> --
>> Marc Schneiders
>> marc@j.root-servers.orsc (Roeland Meyer can send mail to me.)
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>> For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de
>>
>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
>For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: icann-europe-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: icann-europe-help@lists.fitug.de