[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [atlarge-discuss] ALOC Draft - - "political parties"



parties are fine and will probably evolve naturally...  assuming there
are any elections at all (as Jamie pointed out). I support parties with
the proviso that there be elections.

-s


On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 10:53, Esther Dyson wrote:
> Unfortunately, I am not in a position "to put Denise to work" on something. 
> What she writes is a balance between the ICANN board and what she hears on 
> the lists....  and as I said, when I floated this idea it got no traction.
> 
> As I just asked, ANYONE ELSE INTERESTED IN PARTIES?
> 
> I would be delighted to see some buy-in and then indeed I'm sure Denise at 
> least would pay attention.  Getting the board interested is an even greater 
> challenge, but yes, let's include it in the draft if there is some visible 
> interest.
> 
> Esther
> 
> 
> At 08:53 PM 7/28/2002, Joop Teernstra wrote:
> >At 05:14 p.m. 28/07/2002 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
> >>good idea..... but I've tried it before and it seems to have no 
> >>traction.  ANyone else??
> >
> >
> >Esther,
> >
> >I remember that you mentioned representation based on Parties in an 
> >interview some time ago, but that was all.
> >If you had actually put Denise to work on writing draft parliamentary 
> >rules under which such a system could work, you would see instant traction.
> >
> >But it seems you yourself are only luke-warm to the idea, seeing it only 
> >as a solution for the "long term".
> >
> >I see it as the quickest way to stop much of the internecine bickering and 
> >fighting for control that will otherwise dog At Large organizing efforts.
> >
> >Fact is that different individuals have different priorities and points of 
> >view and will want to flock around  different representatives.
> >
> >Fact is that it personality conflicts between representatives drain a huge 
> >amount of energy out of a united effort, preventing constructive work on 
> >real issues.
> >
> >Multi-party representation provides the only solution to those problems.
> >
> >
> >--Joop
> 
> 
> 
> Esther Dyson                    Always make new mistakes!
> chairman, EDventure Holdings
> writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below)
> edyson@edventure.com
> 1 (212) 924-8800    --   fax  1 (212) 924-0240
> 104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor)
> New York, NY 10011 USA
> http://www.edventure.com
> 
> The conversation continues..... at
> http://www.edventure.com/conversation/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de
> 

This is a digitally signed message part