Re: [atlarge-discuss] WG-OUTREACH 004 - E-mail group andadministrivia *with PROPOSAL

[eric@hi-tek.com]

Oh for sure Richard,
Outreach is friendship.
but if you have not flushed your toilet or cleaned your room do you really want to
invite friends over?
Inside to outside - inside to inside - outside to inside and hopefully all on our
side.
By-Laws and a mission statement are still sitting in our toilet, I suggest you get
those written first.
You cannot outreach until you have inreach!
e

Stephen Waters wrote:

> My opinion:
>
> 1. Mailing lists should be started through a simple request to WG-WEB or
> Web-team or Mail-team (assuming we get that big). Unless it's really
> questionable/trivial, lists should be created as soon as possible.
>
> 2. Mailing lists of themselves should not be official -- only the people
> who are a part of a WG should be official.
>
> 3. WG consensus decisions derived from list discussion should be
> delivered to the Panel in some sort of official fashion (mail to
> atlarge-panel by a designated person, probably).
>
> -s
>
> On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 15:19, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > My "stupid" question is this : Have we, as participants, got the right and
> > sanction of the whole organisation to just go ahead and start a list for
> > outreach (in the absence of anyone producing anything else) or do we have to
> > wait for a general policy decision to be taken on what lists and where, for
> > ALL the working groups?
>
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                        Name: signature.asc
>    signature.asc       Type: application/pgp-signature
>                 Description: This is a digitally signed message part


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de