Re: [atlarge-discuss] Vision Re: [atlarge-discuss] WG-OUTREACH 003 - Update and Action List

[Joop Teernstra <terastra@terabytz.co.nz>]

At 11:22 a.m. 22/10/2002 -0400, espresso@e-scape.net wrote:

> Thus far, *nobody's* vision of the "atlarge" is "generally supported", and 
> we're not yet entirely sure what our present purposes actually are.
>
> This is a *BIG* handicap in deciding what should be done now and how.
>
> So far, we are not an organization with a defined mission but a loose 
> agglomeration of individuals with various visions of what that mission 
> should be and how best to implement it. Once the agglomeration has become 
> a real organization, some people may choose to leave and pursue their own 
> visions in other ways, while those who stay will have a much better idea 
> of what needs to be done.
>
> For the moment, I still maintain (ornery old bat that I am) that *nothing* 
> constructive will happen here unless we can agree on the mechanisms by 
> which we can determine whether any given proposal has the support of the 
> membership or not.
Hear, hear!


--Joop



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de