Re: [atlarge-discuss] Poll watcher rights and duties

[Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com>]

Judyth and all fellow members,

espresso@e-scape.net wrote:

> At 20:17 -0700 2003/04/12, Jeff Williams responded to Jan Siren:
> >> Before things get out of hand here.
> >>
> >> I can't speak for Judyth.  But I haven't been approached by
> >>Jefsey, Bruce nor Eric, individually or acting as a Panel, about
> >>"looking after the election."
> >
> >  I suspected as much.  Jefsey is simply providing false information
> > again. How sad...  :(
> >
> >> One possible scenario is that they would approach me with *their*
> >> requirements.  And I would respond with *my* requirements.  We would
> >> negotiate; and we might, or might not, reach an agreement.
> >
> >  You are not in a legal position to negotiate anything with respect to
> >Members data or the membership list at this juncture, unless you wish
> >also to be in some near future legal trouble.  BTW, neither are Judyth,
> >Jefsey, Eric or Bruce.
>
> Jeff,
>
> Perhaps it's time you stopped being deliberately obtuse and
> concentrated on sticking to legitimate arguments.

  I did.  However I can see from your response here that perhaps
your continuing characterization's of exactly what I stated should
be better considered.

>
>
> It's obvious that Jan referred to negotiating the conditions
> for his involvement in running the election, if he were
> asked to, which you have no grounds to threaten legal action
> over since each individual member has the right to determine
> what he or she will or won't do as an individual.

  Exactly right that I have the right as an individual to suggest
legal action if such legal action is necessary and prudent.
Hence your confused rant here is less than accurate in
your own contrived context.  However I shall not even
attempt to parse such a diatribe that you present.

>
>
> Can't we stop the nonsense and concentrate on something
> really important -- like improving upon the list of questions
> Bruce proposed for inclusion with the original "Call for
> Nominations" message?

  You can do what you desire to engage in as you see fit
Judyth.  However nominations of any kind at this juncture
is premature IMHO, as there is yet to be a safe, voting
process or system by which to adequately consider such
nominations.  In addition, the membership list is in some
disarray as has been previously discussed here, and that
membership list has also been exposed as well as intercepted
as it was transferred without the permission of each and ever members
approval in an insecure manner and therefore without prior
knowledge YOU Judyth endangered  every member.

>
>
> Regards,
>
> Judyth
>
> ##########################################################
> Judyth Mermelstein     "cogito ergo lego ergo cogito..."
> Montreal, QC           <espresso@e-scape.net>
> ##########################################################
> "A word to the wise is sufficient. For others, use more."
> "Un mot suffit aux sages; pour les autres, il en faut plus."
> ##########################################################
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
> For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de

Regards,
--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 129k members/stakeholders strong!)
================================================================
CEO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
Information Network Eng. Group. INEG. INC.
E-Mail jwkckid1@ix.netcom.com
Contact Number: 214-244-4827 or 214-244-3801



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de