[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ICANN-EU] BiGuB-Questionaire, results



On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 08:16:35PM +0200, Andreas Bogk <andreas@andreas.org> wrote:
> > > > entitled to your opinion, but this is no reason to ignore the facts. I am
> > > In that particular case, there are no facts.
> > Indeed. So why do you try to cite (unrelated) facts? ;(
> 
> Because the press release you forwarded is a plain lie,

Hard words. Can you prove that Andy answered their questions (whichnwas
their main point?). Accusing others of lieing is very harsh, especially if
there is nothing you can prove it with :(

> So the statement that Andys home page is inaccessible to blind users
> is a lie.

Neither me nor they made that statement. Can you read?

> But the wording in the press release gives us hints that the author
> talks about the CCC homepage.

Indeed. Their error.

> - This was what the "security measures" were referring to

Most probably.

> So the statement that the CCC homepage is inaccessible to blind users
> is a lie as well.

Neither me nor they made that statement. Can you read?

> You forwarded the press release, and tried to give Andy a bad name,

He did that himself on this list already.

> without checking the facts.

Well, their main point was that Andy didn't answer. Please prove that this
is a lie. I think it is difficult to prove that, and I think a public
apologize is in order.

Of course, I do not expect _reason_ from ccc people. Nor do I expect them
to be able to read, either.

> Because he gained a lot of experience during his work in representing
> the CCC. And as a member of the CCC I am confident that he's a good
> candidate for ICANN, because he did his job well.

What's the connection between what he did for the CCC and the qualifcations
needed to beocme ICANN director? I think there aren't, and Andy didn'T try to
clarify that, either.

However, this is my personal opinion, which you (and many others) do not
follow.

> That's no excuse for confusing the two.

I _really_ think you should tone down quickly. You should first try to
learn the basics of discussing, one of it is not accusing people of lies
before reading carefully what they wrote.

-- 
      -----==-                                             |
      ----==-- _                                           |
      ---==---(_)__  __ ____  __       Marc Lehmann      +--
      --==---/ / _ \/ // /\ \/ /       pcg@opengroup.org |e|
      -=====/_/_//_/\_,_/ /_/\_\       XX11-RIPE         --+
    The choice of a GNU generation                       |
                                                         |