Re: [ICANN-EU] Don't waste your endorsement vote

["Griffini Giorgio" <grunz@tin.it>]

Joop wrote:
> At 00:49 5/09/00 +0200, Griffini Giorgio wrote:
> 
> >Personally speaking, I'm in trouble because I would prefer the second and 
> >the third going into the ballot but I cannot see a way my withdrawal could 
> >help. (The first ranked candidate really made a good job in not showing his 
> >opinions here, so I cannot reasonably afford to blindly trust him for the
> 'social 
> >issues' more minded role) 
> >
> Dear Giorgio, 
> 
> Would you be able to narrow your endorsement further down between 2 and 3?
> It looks like to option to have them both does not exist.
> 
Believe it or not I do not know who are my endorsers (apart maybe one who 
was telling that) because I did not organized a group to support me. (If it was 
my intention I surely had the chance to place few mouse clicks for promoting 
my self to 60K co-workers in my company and maybe getting a better 
endorsement count than now. But this was/is _not_ my way) 
Then, the only option I have is to narrow down to 0 by withdrawing. 
But this may mean that with all probability such endorsement votes will be 
lost and not counted into the grand total.

> For me, I have read already enough from Lutz to know my own preference.
> There are already far too many SysAdmins with a god-complex gravitating
> towards Internet Governance.
> But if we are going to have an academic, I would rather have seen a
> Political Scientist or a Professor in Constitutional or Administration Law.  
> This is what the ICANN Board is going to need most for the next 2 years of
> Bylaw finetuning.
> 
Yes, but at this ICANN election restaurant we have just this menu to choose 
from so if we would like to eat we have to choose some of these dishes. 
Those we like most or that we not dislike at all. :-)
(dessert is not yet included)

Best regards
Giorgio Griffini