Re: [atlarge-discuss] WE WANT ELECTIONS NOT a COUP

[DPF <david@farrar.com>]

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 02:20:01 -0000, "Richard Henderson"
<richardhenderson@ntlworld.com> wrote:

>I remain convinced that we can identify three members who (collectively) we
>could trust, and given the early stage of our development, we could just get
>voters to "Reply to All" and get the election results delivered to those
>three trusted members. If one of the members decided to fiddle the results
>(hugely unlikely in my opinion) then the other two would be able to
>contradict them. Get the cc. sent to five members if you like! I can think
>of all kinds of people like Ron Sherwood or Judyth Mermelstein who would die
>rather than corrupt a democratic vote. Add Vivek. Add Walt. Between all our
>members we can certainly find some trustworthy people. Only people who
>certainly couldn't be used would be those who were standing for election
>themselves.

If you do decide to do it this way, I could arrange an e-mail address
which will forward on to all the scrutineers so people can still just
send their ballots to the one address yet it will go to all three
scrutineers.

DPF
--
E-mail: david@farrar.com
ICQ:    29964527
MSN:    dpf666@hotmail.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-unsubscribe@lists.fitug.de
For additional commands, e-mail: atlarge-discuss-help@lists.fitug.de